| Author |
Message
|
| Wolfgang |
 Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 10:17 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Kobold Overlord
Joined: 30 Dec 2007
Posts: 4986
Location: The Mines
|
I'm not sure whether there is a more recent version; I haven't seen this error, though, so.... I'll check. Hit me in email and I'll get you the revised file.
_________________
Wolfgang Baur
Publisher, Kobold Press |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| richgreen01 |
| Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Patron
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 774
Location: London, UK
|
| Wolfgang wrote: |
| I'm not sure whether there is a more recent version; I haven't seen this error, though, so.... I'll check. Hit me in email and I'll get you the revised file. |
Thanks! Have sent you an email. The original patron version didn't have this problem. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| richgreen01 |
| Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Patron
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 774
Location: London, UK
|
I finished reading Red Eye yesterday and have posted some thoughts (not a review!) on the adventure to my LJ here.
Has anyone run one or two of the later scenarios as a one off? That's what I'm thinking of doing as my primary focus is the two D&D campaigns set in Parsantium.
Cheers
Richard |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| deinol |
| Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Patron
Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 380
|
I've run the first three so far. We have other regular games, so this only comes out every couple of months. I suggest starting at the beginning, because each episode is self contained enough that you don't have to have clear memories of the last episodes. And the GM can always remind people of previous events with flashbacks.
Every adventure has been fun to run so far. Maybe next month we'll have time to do part 4.
Edit to note: We managed to play the first 3 parts in 4 hour sessions each. Of course, you don't have to run them in order. Reading your blog, if the 3rd adventure grabs you, run that first. Then ask the players if they want to go do some of the other adventures. I suggest adding some flashbacks that give them hints of what they would be like. The final adventure is much longer, and I expect it to take two sessions. Or one monster session.
_________________
-Jesse Butler
Fanig Entertainment or Apathy Blogs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| richgreen01 |
| Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Patron
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 774
Location: London, UK
|
| deinol wrote: |
Of course, you don't have to run them in order. Reading your blog, if the 3rd adventure grabs you, run that first. Then ask the players if they want to go do some of the other adventures. I suggest adding some flashbacks that give them hints of what they would be like. The final adventure is much longer, and I expect it to take two sessions. Or one monster session. |
That's a very good idea - might do that!
Thanks
Rich |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Amy Carrier |
| Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Patron
Joined: 31 May 2008
Posts: 588
|
I'm about to use The Red Eye in my current 3.5E campaign. The group has bee "primed" with some teaser information and clues, and I expect the real adventure to begin at our next game.
Sadly we only get to play every other week (and sometimes we miss a game even then) so it will take a couple months to play it through. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sir_ollibolli |
| Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Patron
Joined: 03 Apr 2008
Posts: 18
|
| Darn, totally missed the print option here... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
