| Author |
Message
|
| Kthulhu |
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:07 am Post subject: Question about 4E Supplements |
|
|

Joined: 03 Apr 2010 Posts: 9
|
Actually, a couple of questions:
1. How likely are there to be PFRPG versions of the 4E supplements? (Lost City, Soldier of Fortune, Courts of the Shadow Fey)
2. If not, how much good information is in those supplements that's system-neutral?
Thanks a lot! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| metatsu |
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Patron
Joined: 22 Nov 2009 Posts: 104
|
I can't speak for the likelihood of an official conversion, but overall the adventures would be system neutral, except for converting monsters, traps, skill challenges, magic items and NPCs. I have run the the Lost City and Halls of the Mountain King using 4E, but I play pathfinder as well (as a player).
I had no problems adapting Lost City to Eberron and Halls of the Mountain King to Forgotten Realms. But any references to geography, cities, or gods would need to updated for Golarion. Perhaps someone with more knowledge of Midgard could comment on the similarities between the two worlds. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Kthulhu |
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|

Joined: 03 Apr 2010 Posts: 9
|
| metatsu wrote: |
I can't speak for the likelihood of an official conversion, but overall the adventures would be system neutral, except for converting monsters, traps, skill challenges, magic items and NPCs. I have run the the Lost City and Halls of the Mountain King using 4E, but I play pathfinder as well (as a player).
I had no problems adapting Lost City to Eberron and Halls of the Mountain King to Forgotten Realms. But any references to geography, cities, or gods would need to updated for Golarion. Perhaps someone with more knowledge of Midgard could comment on the similarities between the two worlds. |
Cool. I wasn't really planning on putting them into Golarion, though. Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|