Comments on: Weapons and Armor: A +2 What, Sir? (Part 2 of 2)

By: Phatboi

Phatboi — Thu, 08 Dec 2011 19:36:00 +0000

I would love to see this technique applied to class levels. 1e had level names, but 3.5 seems to have abandoned it. I miss using terms like Acolyte, Strider, Hero, etc.

By: panchoman36

panchoman36 — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 09:14:21 +0000

This is so cool, now I just gotta get me and players to use this

By: Sean

Sean — Tue, 06 Dec 2011 23:19:31 +0000

Interesting concept, and more immersive. A “boring” rapier though?

By: TimsterMon

TimsterMon — Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:06:48 +0000

from part I : TimsterMon

December 5, 2011 at 6:53 pm

Love it. My only potential concern is when other magical weapon attributes are already taken that could seem better in this naming schema, or that might confuse the weapon’s actual attributes.

By: TimsterMon

TimsterMon — Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:46:44 +0000

I’m thinking that I’m liking this and am going to try to spring it on my group and see what they think. I get so annoyed with the meta-gaming at times, and I see this as a way to tone that down.

By: Todd the Bladesmith

Todd the Bladesmith — Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:42:17 +0000

Wolfgang and I hit the send button simultaneously…

By: Todd the Bladesmith

Todd the Bladesmith — Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:41:34 +0000

Yeah, I’m liking this also.

By: Wolfgang

Wolfgang — Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:41:34 +0000

Yeah, Ryan picked a great topic and really made it work.