Comments on: Bonus Ranger Tracking Sheet http://www.koboldquarterly.com/k/front-page3877.php Monsters and Magic for D&D Gamers Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:32:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: kris http://www.koboldquarterly.com/k/front-page3877.php/comment-page-1#comment-5127 kris Sun, 14 Mar 2010 04:43:20 +0000 http://www.koboldquarterly.com/k/?p=3877#comment-5127 in the ranger talents it says you can't take an individual talent more than once but under the ranger feat it says "Instead of a talent, the ranger may choose a feat " so can you take this feat more than once? in the ranger talents it says you can’t take an individual talent more than once but under the ranger feat it says “Instead of a talent, the ranger may choose a feat ” so can you take this feat more than once?

]]> By: BalorX http://www.koboldquarterly.com/k/front-page3877.php/comment-page-1#comment-4826 BalorX Tue, 02 Mar 2010 04:43:56 +0000 http://www.koboldquarterly.com/k/?p=3877#comment-4826 Glad to find I'm not the only person in favor of a spell-less ranger. Glad to find I’m not the only person in favor of a spell-less ranger.

]]> By: John Reyst http://www.koboldquarterly.com/k/front-page3877.php/comment-page-1#comment-4012 John Reyst Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:12:59 +0000 http://www.koboldquarterly.com/k/?p=3877#comment-4012 Are these sheets OGC? Are these sheets OGC?

]]> By: Wolfgang http://www.koboldquarterly.com/k/front-page3877.php/comment-page-1#comment-3991 Wolfgang Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:14:12 +0000 http://www.koboldquarterly.com/k/?p=3877#comment-3991 @Iceshard I'm glad I'm not the only one who loved the 1e and 2e Illusionist! It's a tough class because it requires a lot of player initiative and a lot of careful DM rulings. @Iceshard I’m glad I’m not the only one who loved the 1e and 2e Illusionist! It’s a tough class because it requires a lot of player initiative and a lot of careful DM rulings.

]]> By: Marc Radle http://www.koboldquarterly.com/k/front-page3877.php/comment-page-1#comment-3990 Marc Radle Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:43:08 +0000 http://www.koboldquarterly.com/k/?p=3877#comment-3990 @Sultan ... hmmm, funny you should mention that actually ... @Sultan … hmmm, funny you should mention that actually …

]]> By: Iceshard http://www.koboldquarterly.com/k/front-page3877.php/comment-page-1#comment-3988 Iceshard Sat, 30 Jan 2010 08:56:16 +0000 http://www.koboldquarterly.com/k/?p=3877#comment-3988 It makes sense that a pure spellcaster (WIZ, SOR, CLR) can ultra-specialize... we've got a pure Evoker (adapted from 2e) in our current game. With Buff spells from the Cleric and a tank as the front-runner, the party is almost Juggernaught quality. I'd like to see the old 2e and 1e Illusionists again. It makes sense that a pure spellcaster (WIZ, SOR, CLR) can ultra-specialize… we’ve got a pure Evoker (adapted from 2e) in our current game. With Buff spells from the Cleric and a tank as the front-runner, the party is almost Juggernaught quality.

I’d like to see the old 2e and 1e Illusionists again.

]]> By: Fenryx http://www.koboldquarterly.com/k/front-page3877.php/comment-page-1#comment-3987 Fenryx Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:58:37 +0000 http://www.koboldquarterly.com/k/?p=3877#comment-3987 Sorry but not that useful to me, if you want a spell-less ranger go play 4E Sorry but not that useful to me, if you want a spell-less ranger go play 4E

]]> By: Sultan http://www.koboldquarterly.com/k/front-page3877.php/comment-page-1#comment-3986 Sultan Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:20:04 +0000 http://www.koboldquarterly.com/k/?p=3877#comment-3986 Seems to me that a spellcasting warrior type class is always popular. Seems to me that a spellcasting warrior type class is always popular.

]]>